Taylor Swift
Baldoni Tried To Manipulate Her For Public Support
Claims Of Legal Threats
Published May 14, 2025 12:04 PM PDT
|
Updated May 14, 2025 5:32 PM PDT
Legal Maneuvering and Allegations
The legal battle involving Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni has taken unsettling turns, particularly concerning the role of Taylor Swift. According to Justin Baldoni’s attorney, Michael Gottlieb, a motion was filed to remove a letter from Baldoni, arguing that it was “baseless, unnecessary, improper and abusive.” This letter allegedly portrayed attempts to forge a public alliance between Swift and Lively amidst the tumultuous situation.
Pressure on Taylor Swift
Taylor Swift is reported to have been pressured by Lively’s legal team to publicly support her amidst her ongoing conflict with Baldoni. The threats escalated to a disturbing level, with suggestions that Swift’s private messages could be released if she did not comply. This explosive claim has raised eyebrows and ignited discussions about the ethics of leveraging personal communications in legal strategies.
Subpoena for Evidence
In documented evidence obtained by TMZ, Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, justified the subpoena sent to Swift’s attorneys as a means to gather information concerning potential witness tampering and evidence spoliation in the case. This subpoena, according to Freedman, was essential to support Baldoni’s stance and to expose any intimidation tactics allegedly employed by Lively’s camp.
Allegations of Intimidation
The claims made by Freedman point toward a wider strategy of intimidation purportedly orchestrated by Blake Lively’s attorneys. It is alleged that Lively’s representatives pressured Swift to delete their text messages. This tactic, if proven, could indicate a serious breach of legal and ethical standards. The implications of these actions could have far-reaching consequences in their ongoing legal feud.
Lively’s Legal Team’s Tactics
Freedman also contends that Michael Gottlieb, one of Lively’s attorneys, reached out to Swift’s representation. It is alleged that Gottlieb demanded Swift issue a public statement supporting Lively, hinting that failure to do so could result in the release of personal text messages. Such threats, if accurately reported, would raise substantial legal and moral questions regarding the behavior of Lively’s legal team.
Response from Swift’s Attorney
In light of these allegations, it has been suggested that one of Swift’s representatives addressed the “inappropriate and apparently extortionate threats” made by Lively’s team in official communications. This acknowledgment of threats adds another layer of complexity to an already intricate legal situation, as it highlights the potential for misconduct on both sides.
Communication as Evidence
Freedman is reportedly seeking the communications from Lively’s legal team via the subpoena, stating that these messages could serve as critical evidence. He argues that they may exemplify attempts to intimidate and potentially manipulate a key witness in the litigation. The stakes are high as both parties look to navigate the legal labyrinth that this case presents.
The Fallout from Personal Touchpoints
As the details unfold, it has come to light that the friendship between Blake Lively and Taylor Swift suffered a significant fracture over personal communication. A leaked text message showed Lively referring to herself as “Khaleesi” from Game of Thrones and mentioning that Ryan Reynolds and Swift were her “dragons.” This casual remark reportedly did not sit well with Swift, leading to increased tension between the two.
Swift’s Reaction to the Fallout
Sources close to Swift have indicated that she was extremely displeased upon learning of the text. They firmly dismiss the notion that she ever viewed herself as one of Lively’s “dragons,” which adds a personal dimension to the legal strife. The implication of that relationship dynamic only complicates the ongoing legal interactions and could impact public perceptions of the case.
Ongoing Legal Challenges
Blake Lively is reportedly attempting to counter Swift’s subpoena, arguing that it lacks relevance to the case at hand. Freedman, however, maintains that the materials sought through this legal process are crucial for illuminating the preceding events that have led to the current disputes. This legal back-and-forth serves to highlight the challenges both parties face in untangling their intertwined narratives.
Denials and Counterclaims
Michael Gottlieb has publicly denied the allegations leveled against Lively and her team as “categorically false.” He contends that the claims are grounded in anonymous sources and are “completely untethered from reality.” In an effort to defend Lively, Gottlieb expressed intentions to file motions to hold Baldoni’s legal team accountable for what he calls misconduct, thereby intensifying the legal tensions between both factions.
Concluding Thoughts
The ongoing saga between Taylor Swift, Blake Lively, and Justin Baldoni continues to evolve with serious allegations and strong denials driving the narrative. As both sides prepare for what may be an extended legal confrontation, the implications stretch beyond the courtroom into public perceptions of their personal and professional relationships. With so much at stake, how this drama unfolds will be closely monitored by fans and commentators alike, eager to see how celebrity dynamics interplay with the legal system.
https://www.tmz.com/2025/05/14/blake-lively-strongarm-taylor-swift-public-support-justin-baldoni-feud-lawyer-claims/
